Abstract

Recent experimental work has demonstrated that nitric oxide (NO) is the neutrotransmitter responsible for cavernous smooth muscle relaxation. Different studies on the performance of the direct NO-donor linsidomine chlorhydrate (SIN-1) in patients with erectile dysfunction have come to conflicting results ranging from highest praise to complete dismissal. We reviewed all published studies on the use of SIN-1 for intracorporeal injection in erectile failure including our own. To this date, 3 groups published their data. Only the uncontrolled data from Hannover claim good results. The controlled data from Hamburg and Berlin on patients with erectile failure due to venous leakage, to a mixed aetiology in a double-blind fashion and to mixed aetiology with drug increase (1 mg versus 2 mg of SIN-1) showed a significantly worse performance of SIN-1 compared to the standard drug for penile injection, prostaglandin E1. We conclude that there is no place for linsidomine chlorhydrate in either the diagnosis or the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call