Abstract

To evaluate the process of nitrate accumulation and leaching in surface and ground water, we conducted simulated rainfall experiments. The experiments were performed in areas of 5.3 m2 with bare slopes of 3° that were treated with two nitrogen fertilizer inputs, high (22.5 g/m2 NH4NO3) and control (no fertilizer), and subjected to 2 hours of rainfall, with. From the 1st to the 7th experiments, the same content of fertilizer mixed with soil was uniformly applied to the soil surface at 10 minutes before rainfall, and no fertilizer was applied for the 8th through 12th experiments. Initially, the time-series nitrate concentration in the surface flow quickly increased, and then it rapidly decreased and gradually stabilized at a low level during the fertilizer experiments. The nitrogen loss in the surface flow primarily occurred during the first 18.6 minutes of rainfall. For the continuous fertilizer experiments, the mean nitrate concentrations in the groundwater flow remained at less than 10 mg/L before the 5th experiment, and after the 7th experiment, these nitrate concentrations were greater than 10 mg/L throughout the process. The time-series process of the changing concentration in the groundwater flow exhibited the same parabolic trend for each fertilizer experiment. However, the time at which the nitrate concentration began to change lagged behind the start time of groundwater flow by approximately 0.94 hours on average. The experiments were also performed with no fertilizer. In these experiments, the mean nitrate concentration of groundwater initially increased continuously, and then, the process exhibited the same parabolic trend as the results of the fertilization experiments. The nitrate concentration decreased in the subsequent experiments. Eight days after the 12 rainfall experiments, 50.53% of the total nitrate applied remained in the experimental soil. Nitrate residues mainly existed at the surface and in the bottom soil layers, which represents a potentially more dangerous pollution scenario for surface and ground water. The surface and subsurface flow would enter into and contaminate water bodies, thus threatening the water environment.

Highlights

  • Nitrate is a common contaminant of surface water and groundwater and it can cause health problems in infants and animals as well as eutrophication of water bodies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

  • 94% of the nitrogen loading in 270 rivers was caused by non-point source pollution in Denmark [25]

  • The results of the water balance of all twelve experiments showed that approximately 55.2% of the rainfall was lost through surface flow, approximately 28.6% recharged into groundwater, and the sediment bed retained approximately 16.2% of the water at the end of the last experiment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nitrate is a common contaminant of surface water and groundwater and it can cause health problems in infants and animals as well as eutrophication of water bodies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The total nitrogen provided by agricultural non-point sources reached approximately 60% of the total water pollution in the Netherlands [24]. 94% of the nitrogen loading in 270 rivers was caused by non-point source pollution in Denmark [25]. Since the 1980s, nitrogen fertilizer consumption in China has substantially increased, and nitrate pollution of drinking water has become a serious problem [26]. Fan and Hao [27] summarized the primary factors for the accumulation and leaching of NO3-–N in a soil profile and its potential contamination in surface and underground water in northern China

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call