NIMG-37. JOINT LEARNING OF IMAGING AND GENOMIC DATA REVEALS DISTINCT GLIOBLASTOMA SUBTYPES

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE The significant heterogeneity of glioblastoma is typically displayed on both phenotypical and molecular levels. Non-invasive in vivo approaches to characterize this heterogeneity would potentially facilitate personalized therapies. Here we leverage advanced unsupervised machine learning to integrate radiomic imaging features and genomics to identify distinct subtypes of glioblastoma. METHODS A retrospective cohort of 571 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients were collected with pre-operative multi-parametric MRI (T1, T1CE, T2, T2-FLAIR, DSC, DTI) scans (available in 462/571 patients) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) data (available in 355/571 patients). Radiomic features (n= 971) were extracted from these MRI scans and a subset of 12 features were selected by L21-norm minimization. A total of 14 key driver genes in the 5 main pathways that are most frequently altered in glioblastoma were chosen. Subtypes were identified by a joint learning approach called Anchor-based Partial Multi-modal Clustering (APMC) on both radiomic and genomic modalities. RESULTS Three distinct glioblastoma subtypes were discovered by APMC based on 14-dimension NGS data together with 12 selected radiomic features representing characteristics from histograms, shape, and volumetric measures for different tumor sub-regions. The identified subtypes were 1) high-risk; 2) medium-risk; and 3) low-risk, in terms of their overall survival outcome in Kaplan-Meier analysis (p= 5.52e-6, log-rank test; HR= 1.51, 95%CI:1.20-1.74, Cox proportional hazard model). The three subtypes also displayed different molecular characteristics: subtype 1 exhibited increased frequency of mutation in [EGFR, PIK3CA, PTEN, NF1], subtype 3 showed frequently mutated [PDGFRA, ATRX], while subtype 2 did not show significant differences for mutations in any of these genes. CONCLUSION Our results revealed the synergistic value of integrated radiomic signatures and molecular characteristics for glioblastoma subtyping. Joint learning on both modalities could help better understand the molecular basis of phenotypical signatures of glioblastoma and further provide insights into the biologic underpinnings of tumor formation and progression.