Abstract

AbstractLinear developments, such as roads and firebreaks, can increase encounter rates between predator and prey, which could affect predator–prey interactions and community dynamics. However, the extent to which prey responses at the interface between natural and anthropogenic habitats may be compared to those at the interface between natural habitats is unclear. Here, we used a shared‐predator system to investigate the spatial response of red‐necked nightjars (Caprimulgus ruficollis) to changing predation risk on roads, measured as the abundance of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), and their primary prey (rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus). Because all three species coexist closely on unpaved roads in Doñana National Park (Spain), we predicted that nightjars would experience increased predation risk during periods of high fox and low rabbit abundances. Birds could then modify their space use at a broad scale by moving away from risky unpaved roads or, at a finer scale, by seeking foraging microsites facilitating escape from attacks. Between 2011 and 2012, mean rabbit abundance on roads increased by 50%, and fox abundance decreased by 80%, indicating a substantial decrease in predation risk for nightjars. Unexpectedly, nightjar occurrence on roads did not increase as a consequence of the decrease in fox predation risk. However, nightjars foraging on roads became less apprehensive in their use of linear strips of roadside cover, which is known to function as a physical barrier against fox attacks. Specifically, under high predation risk, most nightjars perched on the ground nearby (<15 cm) tall (>150 cm) vegetation, whereas when predation risk decreased, they shifted to more exposed microsites near shorter (<1 m) stands, but rarely close to cover (>45 cm). Nightjars' preference for areas of high predator abundance strongly suggests that flexible microhabitat selection allows them to manage the overall predation risk independently of predator abundance. Our results highlight the importance of linear developments in determining risk exposure and prey use of apparently dangerous habitats and thus may contribute to a better understanding of risky behaviors of prey.

Highlights

  • The spatial configuration of habitats critically influences species occurrence and abundance, and the rate and strength of species interactions (Tewksbury et al 2002, Ries et al 2004, Suarez-Esteban et al 2016)

  • We used a shared-predator system to investigate the spatial response of red-necked nightjars (Caprimulgus ruficollis) to changing predation risk on roads, measured as the abundance of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), and their primary prey

  • Nightjar responses to changing predation risk on unpaved roads

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The spatial configuration of habitats (e.g., fragmentation, patch size, patch area/perimeter ratio) critically influences species occurrence and abundance, and the rate and strength of species interactions (Tewksbury et al 2002, Ries et al 2004, Suarez-Esteban et al 2016). Many nesting birds select edge habitats because of the dual availability of forest cover and foraging areas, but they do so at the expense of increased mortality from edge-foraging generalist predators (e.g., Gates and Gysel 1972, Lima and Dill 1990, Santos and Tellerıa 1992, Keyser et al 1998) Linear developments, such as roads, firebreaks, and railways, can substantially increase the amount of edge habitat and provide a stark juxtaposition of different habitats with contrasting associated predation risks, influencing predator–prey interactions (Latham et al 2011). How prey respond to such dangerous encounters in linear developments is still poorly understood (but see Delgado et al 2001, Pescador and Peris 2007, Suarez-Esteban et al 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call