Nietzsche and Gadamer: From strife to understanding, Achilles/Agamemnon to Achilles/Priam

Abstract

Nietzsche penetrates behind any “rational” discussion to its affective ground, but though he goes deeper than Gadamer's “fusion of horizons,” he nevertheless fails to acknowledge any other affective disposition besides the will to power. Hence for him Gadamer's Sichverstandigung, or reaching an understanding, is fiction. In contrast, Gadamer's Zugehorigkeit, a sense of kinship, and Nachlassen, relenting, suggest not only the possibility of reaching an understanding but its real, affective ground. Two passages from Homer's Iliad illustrate how Nietzsche might penetrate behind Gadamer's intellectualism yet how, at the same time, Gadamer ultimately gets beyond Nietzsche. In Book I, Achilles and Agamemnon can get no further than strife because of their pathos of rage and hostility. Here Nietzsche's will to power explains their altercation entirely. On the other hand, when Achilles is confronted with the devastated Priam in book XXIV, philia and eleos, kinship and mercy, replace his anger; and with the corresponding affective shift in Priam from fear of Achilles to his own feelings of kinship and forgiveness, antipathy becomes sympathy. Only this fusion of affect allows them to reach an understanding.