Abstract
Background and Hypothesis: 
 
 Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is the second leading cause for infant morbidity and mortality behind preterm birth. It is a sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Neonates born <2500g at full-term are classified as “low birth weight.” In the United States, more than 8% of all births fit this classification. These fetuses are at increased risk for both short and long term complications. Traditionally delivery at a NICU capable facility is recommended with an expected birth weight <2500g. There is little data to support this arbitrary cut-off. This study was designed to compare rates of NICU admission and short term complications for liveborn neonates at full-term. We hypothesize these rates will be increased in neonates with a birth weight <2500g. 
 
 Methods: 
 
 This is a proposed retrospective chart review of liveborn neonates at full-term at a regional medical system between January 2013 – December 2020. We excluded women under the age of 18, twins, fetuses with genetic syndromes, anomalies, or abnormal Umbilical Artery Dopplers. Neonates were categorized into two categories: birth weight between 2000 – 2499g and birth weight between 2500-3000g. Outcomes included rates of NICU admission, tachypnea, acidosis, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, feeding difficulties, APGAR scores, and temperature instability. Chi-square and logistic regression were used. 
 
 
 Results: 
 
 This study design will be submitted in the form of an IRB protocol. Results will include statistical comparisons between weight groups for NICU admission and other short term complications. Additionally data analysis on social and demographic characteristics will be done. 
 
 
 Conclusions: 
 
 Results of this study will help determine an adequate cut off for delivery planning and identify characteristics of the mother and fetus to be taken into consideration. These findings could increase need for a prospective trial, be used in evaluation of ultrasound accuracy, and impact the standard of care.
Highlights
Background and HypothesisFetal growth restriction (FGR) is the second leading cause for infant morbidity and mortality behind preterm birth
In the United States, more than 8% of all births fit this classification
These fetuses are at increased risk for both short and long term complications
Summary
Background and HypothesisFetal growth restriction (FGR) is the second leading cause for infant morbidity and mortality behind preterm birth. It is a sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Neonates born
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.