Nicotine-enhanced Pavlovian conditioned approach is resistant to omission of expected outcome

Abstract

Conditioned stimuli contribute to the resilience of nicotine addiction in that nicotine-associated cues can influence smokers and promote relapse. These stimuli are thought to acquire incentive motivational properties through a Pavlovian mechanism, and this phenomenon can be measured in animals by observing conditioned approach to the conditioned stimulus (sign-tracking) or to the location of unconditioned stimulus delivery (goal-tracking). Goal-tracking is thought to be more flexible than sign-tracking in response to changes in expected outcome. Nicotine exposure can increase the expression of conditioned responses, and we hypothesized that animals exposed to nicotine would also exhibit less flexible conditioned responses after a change in the expected unconditioned stimulus. Adult male rats were exposed to nicotine (0.4mg/kg, s.c.) or saline before Pavlovian conditioned approach training sessions. After training, animals underwent test sessions that reduced (water substitution) or withheld (omission) the unconditioned stimulus (US, 20% sucrose). As expected, nicotine enhanced sign- and goal-tracking. Water substitution moderately and nonspecifically reduced both sign- and goal-tracking in all rats. In contrast, US omission only reduced goal-tracking, with robust effects in saline-exposed rats and smaller effects in nicotine-exposed rats. These data support the hypothesis that both sign-tracking and nicotine exposure confer behavioral inflexibility under US omission.