Abstract

The emergence of e-cigarettes on the consumer market led to a tremendous rise in e-cigarette consumption among adolescents in the United States. The success of JUUL and other pod systems was linked to its high nicotine delivery capacity. In compliance with the European Tobacco Product directive, liquid nicotine contents in the European JUUL variants are limited to 20 mg/mL or below. A short time after launching the initial version in Europe, JUUL pods have been modified in terms of the wick material used. This modification has been demonstrated previously to lead to an elevated aerosol generation, consequently, to a larger amount of nicotine per puff generated. The present study was designed to assess whether the mentioned differences between the “initial” and “modified” JUUL versions may cause a significant difference during consumption, and how nicotine delivery compares with tobacco cigarettes. In this single-center three-arm study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and influence on urge to smoke/vape were compared for tobacco cigarettes, the “initial” version of the European JUUL, and the “modified” version of the European JUUL. Participants, 15 active smokers and 17 active e-cigarette users, were instructed to consume their study product according to a pre-directed puffing protocol. Venous blood was sampled for nicotine analysis to cover the acute phase and the first 30 min after starting. Nicotine delivery and the reduction of urge to smoke/vape upon usage of both European JUUL variants were lower in comparison to tobacco cigarettes. This suggests a lower addictive potential. Modification of the pod design did not result in significant differences at the first ten puffs, as confirmed by a vaping machine experiment. Apparently, the limitations by the initially used wick material only come into effect after longer usage time.

Highlights

  • The emergence of e-cigarettes on the consumer market led to a tremendous rise in e-cigarette consumption among adolescents in the United States

  • In the JUUL group the level of physical dependence was low in n = 7/15, moderate in n = 2/15, severe in n = 2/15, and very severe in n = 4/15

  • One participant in the tobacco cigarette group seemed to have not inhaled during smoking as the plasma nicotine level did not rise higher than 0.1 ng/mL

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present study was designed to assess whether the mentioned differences between the “initial” and “modified” JUUL versions may cause a significant difference during consumption, and how nicotine delivery compares with tobacco cigarettes. Nicotine delivery and the reduction of urge to smoke/vape upon usage of both European JUUL variants were lower in comparison to tobacco cigarettes. Nicotine delivery in previous studies was comparable to combustible cigarettes in experienced e-cigarette u­ sers[20] but lower in e-cigarette naïve ­participants[21,22] This shows that the American version of JUUL has the potential for a high nicotine delivery that is dependent on inhalation and user’s experience with e-cigarettes. We have assessed parameters such as nicotine pharmacokinetics, urge to smoke, and adverse effects after consumption of JUUL e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes for experienced e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers using a pre-directed puffing regimen

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call