Abstract

The advantages of using magnesia prepared using two techniques as a support for nickel catalysts for the steam reforming of light hydrocarbons has been examined. The initial specific activities of nickel supported on alumina or magnesia were similar, but deactivation as a result of coke formation was significantly greater on alumina-supported nickel. The steam reforming of ethane and propane over nickel/magnesia catalysts was much less affected by coke formation over longer times-on-line. The effects of variation in the preparation of magnesia were small, differences only appearing in rates of coking of higher hydrocarbons.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call