Abstract

Serpentine soils are edaphically stressful environments that host many endemic plant species. In particular, serpentine soils are high in several heavy metals (e.g. nickel, cobalt and chromium) and these high heavy metal concentrations are thought, in part, to lead to varying levels of plant adaptation and soil affinities (i.e. endemic vs. non-endemic plant species). It is unclear, however, whether serpentine endemics vs. non-endemics differ with respect to heavy metal uptake into either vegetative or reproductive organs. Here, we use nickel as a model to determine whether plant heavy metal uptake varies with the level of endemism in several non-hyperaccumulating species. Under controlled greenhouse conditions, we grew seven plant species from the Brassicaceae family that vary in their degrees of affinity to serpentine soil from low (indifferent) to medium (indicator) and high (endemic) in soil that was nickel supplemented or not. We quantified nickel concentrations in leaves, pistils, anthers, pollen and nectar. While nickel concentrations did not vary across organs or affinities when grown in control soils, under conditions of nickel supplementation endemic species had the lowest tissue concentrations of nickel, particularly when considering leaves and pistils, compared with indifferent/indicator species. Species indifferent to serpentines incorporated higher concentrations of nickel into reproductive organs relative to leaves, but this was not the case for indicator species and endemics where nickel concentration was similar in these organs. Our findings suggest that endemic species possess the ability to limit nickel uptake into above-ground tissues, particularly in reproductive organs where it may interfere with survival and reproduction. Indifferent species accumulated significantly more nickel into reproductive organs compared with leaves, which may limit their reproductive potential relative to endemic species when growing on serpentine soils. Additional work determining the fitness consequences of these differences will further our understanding of edaphic endemism.

Highlights

  • Edaphic factors, such as soil texture, depth and chemical composition, are a primary force in shaping the distributions of plant species (Silvertown 2004; Toledo et al 2012; Dubuis et al 2013)

  • Considering that species span a gradient of affinity to serpentine soils, with some only occasionally found on serpentines (i.e. ‘indifferent’, ≤45 % occurrences on serpentines), some commonly found either on or off serpentines (i.e. ‘indicator’, 55 – 64 % occurrences on serpentines) and others entirely restricted to serpentines (i.e. ‘endemic’, ≥95 % occurrences on serpentines) (Safford et al 2005), serpentine soils provide an ideal system to test whether soil affinity affects tissue chemistry

  • Nickel concentration of pollen from Ni-treated plants was highest for indicator species (59.1 ppm), followed by endemic (44.7 ppm) and indifferent (38.9 ppm) species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Edaphic factors, such as soil texture, depth and chemical composition, are a primary force in shaping the distributions of plant species (Silvertown 2004; Toledo et al 2012; Dubuis et al 2013). While comparisons of plant tissue chemistry between endemic and non-endemic species can provide insight into the physiological features of edaphic endemics (Palacio et al 2007), it is unclear whether soil affinity (i.e. endemic vs non-endemic) affects plant tissue chemistry for serpentine plant species. ‘endemic’, ≥95 % occurrences on serpentines) (Safford et al 2005), serpentine soils provide an ideal system to test whether soil affinity affects tissue chemistry Considering that species span a gradient of affinity to serpentine soils, with some only occasionally found on serpentines (i.e. ‘indifferent’, ≤45 % occurrences on serpentines), some commonly found either on or off serpentines (i.e. ‘indicator’, 55 – 64 % occurrences on serpentines) and others entirely restricted to serpentines (i.e. ‘endemic’, ≥95 % occurrences on serpentines) (Safford et al 2005), serpentine soils provide an ideal system to test whether soil affinity affects tissue chemistry

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call