Nick, Nick. Who’s There? Ethical Considerations When Reporting on the Dark Net

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines ethical considerations of journalists who engage in reporting on the so-called “dark net” using an anonymous nick. Through in-depth interviews with journalists and assignment editors in three Norwegian media houses, the research identifies ethical considerations relating to the research phase, publishing phase and the journalist’s security. The informants adhere to the principles of using false identity as a last resort to reveal information of significant importance to society. Whereas four informants consider the use of nicks as using false identity, two informants challenge such an understanding. This discrepancy might call for an evaluation of whether the present code of ethics is relevant for today’s digital reporting environment. Internal and external transparency is considered essential when using nicks on the dark net for journalistic purposes. The need for documentation is balanced against the need to reduce harm and avoid prosecution due to the illegal character of the content investigated. Keeping one’s nicks secret for future reporting and for source protection is stressed. Encryption and physical distance to those investigated provides protection for journalists. Still, their regular online presence makes them vulnerable to anonymous, digital threats.