Abstract
We explore hypothetical ecologies to explain diversity among predatory dinosaurs in North America’s medial Cretaceous, based on occurrence, tooth morphology, and stable isotope analysis. The Mussentuchit local fauna, Utah, USA, is among the best-known terrestrial vertebrate assemblages from the Cretaceous. Study samples include teeth from six microvertebrate sites, ranging in depositional setting from distal floodplain to channel lags. We recognize four theropod morphotypes: a comparatively large theropod (morph 1), a medium-sized dromaeosaurid (morph 2), a small dromaeosaurid (morph 3), and a tooth-morph similar to the genus Richardoestesia (morph 4). These four morphotypes vary significantly in mean size, from 15.1 mm in the largest theropod to 3.7 mm in Richardoestesia. Further, tooth representation from two of the best-sampled microsites (representing a channel/splay and floodplain deposit) show differing patterns of abundances with morphs 1 and 3 having roughly the same abundance in both sites, while morph 2 was more abundant in the floodplain setting and morph 4 was more abundant in the channel/splay. Stable isotope analysis (δ13C; δ18O) of tooth carbonate from the theropod morphotypes, goniopholidid crocodilians, and matrix (to test for diagenesis) from these sites were also analyzed. The theropods show modest differences in δ13C values between each other, with carbonate from the teeth of morphs 1, 3, and 4 being enriched in 13C for the channel/splay relative to the floodplain environments, possibly indicative of dietary plasticity in these species. We hypothesize that these data indicate that the Mussentuchit theropods had different niches within the predator guild, suggesting plausible means by which ecospace was divided among the predatory dinosaurs of the Mussentuchit local fauna.
Highlights
Obvious adaptations associated with particular diets, and that many taxa lack representation by anatomically informative fossils
Without further lines of evidence, determining the precise trophic ecology of these dinosaurs is problematic beyond characterization as “generalist predator”, a label that could reasonably be attributed to any sharp-toothed species
In all well-sampled Late Cretaceous terrestrial faunas, multiple small- to medium-sized theropods coexisted[6]. These faunas include: dromaeosaurs, troodontids, and small tyrannosaurs, each possessing clear anatomical specialization for predatory lifestyles. Adaptations, such as sharp, recurved teeth and long sickle-shaped claws with enlarged basal tubercles, broadly suggest that these theropods would be in direct competition if they preyed upon the same species
Summary
Obvious adaptations associated with particular diets, and that many taxa lack representation by anatomically informative fossils. In all well-sampled Late Cretaceous terrestrial faunas, multiple small- to medium-sized theropods coexisted[6] These faunas include: dromaeosaurs, troodontids, and small (or juvenile) tyrannosaurs, each possessing clear anatomical specialization for predatory lifestyles. Adaptations, such as sharp, recurved teeth and long sickle-shaped claws with enlarged basal tubercles (for attachment of flexor tendons), broadly suggest that these theropods would be in direct competition if they preyed upon the same species. We investigate the realized dietary niche of theropods from relatively well-sampled micro-bonebeds, derived from the Late Cretaceous Mussentuchit Member ( referred to as MM) of the Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah. The unit is generally highly fossiliferous (as compared to the rest of the Cedar Mountain Formation), with a diverse fauna composed of freshwater fishes, lissamphibians, lepidosaurs, crocodilians, dinosaurs, and mammals[19,20]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
