Abstract

Coexistence of competing species in the same foraging guild has long puzzled ecologists. In particular, how do small subordinate species persist with larger dominant competitors? This question becomes particularly important when conservation interventions, such as reintroduction or translocation, become necessary for the smaller species. Exclusion of dominant competitors might be necessary to establish populations of some endangered species. Ultimately, however, the goal should be to conserve whole communities. Determining how subordinate species escape competitive exclusion in intact communities could inform conservation decisions by clarifying the ecological conditions and processes required for coexistence at local or regional scales. We tested for spatial and temporal partitioning among six species of native, granivorous rodents using null models, and characterized the microhabitat of each species using resource-selection models. We found that the species’ nightly activity patterns are aggregated temporally but segregated spatially. As expected, we found clear evidence that the larger-bodied kangaroo rats drive spatial partitioning, but we also found species-specific microhabitat associations, which suggests that habitat heterogeneity is part of what enables these species to coexist. Restoration of natural disturbance regimes that create habitat heterogeneity, and selection of translocation sites without specific competitors, are among the management recommendations to consider in this case. More generally, this study highlights the need for a community-level approach to conservation and the usefulness of basic ecological data for guiding management decisions.

Highlights

  • It is still an open question how multiple species that are similar in diet and habitat use can persist together in communities (Hutchinson 1961; Robinson and Terborgh 1995; Manlick et al 2021)

  • Interactions between species may be in the form of interference competition, where interspecific aggression occurs over shared resources, or exploitative competition, where species interact indirectly by depleting a shared, limiting resource

  • We sought to identify factors contributing to spatial and temporal partitioning, which could potentially reduce interspecific resource competition and stabilize coexistence, in a guild of six granivorous rodent species, four of which are at risk of extinction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is still an open question how multiple species that are similar in diet and habitat use can persist together in communities (Hutchinson 1961; Robinson and Terborgh 1995; Manlick et al 2021). Community assembly rules and coexistence theory can provide a basis for investigating co-occurrence (Diamond 1975; Chesson 2000; HilleRisLambers et al 2012). Important contributors to local coexistence (Chesson 2000). If a superior competitor causes a decline in the population growth rate of an inferior competitor, the result may be competitive exclusion—the local extirpation of the inferior competitor. Interactions between species may be in the form of interference competition, where interspecific aggression occurs over shared resources, or exploitative competition, where species interact indirectly by depleting a shared, limiting resource. Interference and exploitative competition are generally expected to reduce the probability of species coexistence, under some circumstances interspecific competition can stabilize coexistence (Amarasekare 2002; Grether et al 2017)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call