Abstract

Intra-population niche differences in generalist foragers have captured the interest of ecologists, because such individuality can have important ecological and evolutionary implications. Few researchers have investigated how these differences affect the relationships among ecologically similar, sympatric species. Using stable isotopes, stomach contents, morphology and habitat preference, we examined niche partitioning within a group of five anurans and determined whether variation within species could facilitate resource partitioning. Species partitioned their niches by trophic level and by foraging habitat. However, there was considerable intraspecific variation in trophic level, with larger individuals generally feeding at higher trophic levels. For species at intermediate trophic levels, smaller individuals overlapped in trophic level with individuals of smaller species and larger individuals overlapped with the smallest individuals from larger species. Species varied in carbon isotopes; species with enriched carbon isotope ratios foraged farther from ponds, whereas species with depleted carbon isotope values foraged closer to ponds. Our study shows that these species partition their niches by feeding at different trophic levels and foraging at different distances from ponds. The intraspecific variation in trophic level decreased the number of individuals from each species that overlapped in trophic level with individuals from other species, which can facilitate species coexistence.

Highlights

  • Similar, sympatric species may avoid competitive exclusion by partitioning their niches [1,2,3,4]

  • We investigated resource partitioning and intraspecific trait variation in five anurans, Anaxyrus americanus, A. fowleri, Lithobates catesbeianus, L. clamitans and L. sphenocephalus

  • Species differed in the second principal components analysis (PCA) axis, associated with size-adjusted metatarsal length (F = 5.035, d.f. = 4, 261, p < 0.001); L. catesbeianus had smaller size-adjusted metatarsal length than L. clamitans (p = 0.002) and both toad species (p = 0.008 between A. americanus and L. catesbeianus and p = 0.015 between A. fowleri and L. catesbeianus)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Similar, sympatric species may avoid competitive exclusion by partitioning their niches [1,2,3,4]. Niche partitioning has been a primary focus of many population and community ecology studies, as it resolves the paradox between early theoretical/laboratory studies demonstrating competitive. Exclusion and the fact that many ecosystems have ecologically similar species that do not drive one 2 another extinct [5,6,7]. Niche partitioning has been a central idea in ecology for over half a century, and it remains an active and important part of ecological research [4,10,11,12]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call