Abstract
In April 2000 the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) issued their first appraisal in the field of surgery, "Guidance on the selection of prostheses for primary total hip replacement". NICE has already been heavily criticised for its recommendations in the field of medicine, due to its perceived role in rationing healthcare. This paper examines the conclusions of the appraisal committee (which included only two orthopaedic surgeons), the evidence on which they drew their conclusions and the evidence that was overlooked. We conclude that it is not clear how they determined the important ten-year benchmark and that they over-emphasise the benefits of cheaper cemented prostheses, failing to fully consider the evidence for the more expensive uncemented and hybrid combinations. (Hip International 2002; 12: 334-7).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
