Abstract

Health claims on foods are a way of informing consumers about the health benefits of a food product. Traditionally, these claims are based on scientific evaluation of markers originating from a pharmacological view on health. About a decade ago, the definition of health has been rephrased to ‘the ability to adapt’ that opened up the possibility for a next generation of health claims based on a new way of quantifying health by evaluating resilience. Here, we would like to introduce an opportunity for future scientific substantiation of health claims on food products by using whole-grain wheat as an example. Characterization of the individual whole wheat grain food product or whole wheat flour would probably be considered as sufficiently characterized by the European Food Safety Authority, while the food category whole grain is not specific enough. Meta-analysis provides the scientific evidence that long-term whole-grain wheat consumption is beneficial for health, although results from single ‘gold standard’ efficacy studies are not always straight forward based on classic measurement methods. Future studies may want to underpin the scientific argumentation that long-term whole grain wheat consumption improves resilience, by evaluating the disruption and rate of a selected panel of blood markers in response to a standardized oral protein glucose lipid tolerance test and aggregated into biomarkers with substantiated physiological benefits, to make a next-generation health claim for whole-grain wheat achievable in the near future.

Highlights

  • Health claims on foods are a way of informing consumers about the ‘treats’ of a product

  • In order to facilitate future health claim substantiation related to food products from which metaanalyses generate a positive association with beneficial health outcomes, the resilience approach could be a solution

  • The example of whole-grain wheat teaches us that characterization of one product is preferred above the food category and that whole wheat grains and whole wheat flour probably would be considered as sufficiently characterized by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health claims on foods are a way of informing consumers about the ‘treats’ of a product. (c) sufficient evidence is present on the cause and effect relationship between consumption of a product and the claimed health effect, and (d) the quantity that is needed to consume the food constituent fits into a normal diet pattern [2]. This is of interest as citizens are becoming more aware and are Nutrients 2020, 12, 2945; doi:10.3390/nu12102945 www.mdpi.com/journal/nutrients. Most biomarkers which are currently in use and accepted by regulatory authorities are focused on showing effects on disease rather than on health improvement in a healthy range of the population This complicates the design and execution of science-based intervention studies focusing on the demonstration of health effects in healthy consumers. We would like to introduce an opportunity for future scientific substantiation for health claims of food products by using whole-grain wheat as an example

Whole-Grain Wheat and Its Health Effects
Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation as a Targetable Example
Alternative Method for Measurement of Health Effects
Health Claims on Whole-Grain Wheat
EFSA Requirements for Sufficient Evidence
Substantiation of Scientific Evidence for Whole-Grain Wheat
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call