Abstract
SummaryBackgroundExisting WHO estimates of the prevalence of mental disorders in emergency settings are more than a decade old and do not reflect modern methods to gather existing data and derive estimates. We sought to update WHO estimates for the prevalence of mental disorders in conflict-affected settings and calculate the burden per 1000 population.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we updated a previous systematic review by searching MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO, and Embase for studies published between Jan 1, 2000, and Aug 9, 2017, on the prevalence of depression, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. We also searched the grey literature, such as government reports, conference proceedings, and dissertations, to source additional data, and we searched datasets from existing literature reviews of the global prevalence of depression and anxiety and reference lists from the studies that were identified. We applied the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting and used Bayesian meta-regression techniques that adjust for predictors of mental disorders to calculate new point prevalence estimates with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) in settings that had experienced conflict less than 10 years previously.FindingsWe estimated that the prevalence of mental disorders (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia) was 22·1% (95% UI 18·8–25·7) at any point in time in the conflict-affected populations assessed. The mean comorbidity-adjusted, age-standardised point prevalence was 13·0% (95% UI 10·3–16·2) for mild forms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder and 4·0% (95% UI 2·9–5·5) for moderate forms. The mean comorbidity-adjusted, age-standardised point prevalence for severe disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe depression, severe anxiety, and severe post-traumatic stress disorder) was 5·1% (95% UI 4·0–6·5). As only two studies provided epidemiological data for psychosis in conflict-affected populations, existing Global Burden of Disease Study estimates for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder were applied in these estimates for conflict-affected populations.InterpretationThe burden of mental disorders is high in conflict-affected populations. Given the large numbers of people in need and the humanitarian imperative to reduce suffering, there is an urgent need to implement scalable mental health interventions to address this burden.FundingWHO; Queensland Department of Health, Australia; and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Highlights
There are major conflict-induced humanitarian crises in numerous countries, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria, and Yemen
We aimed to estimate disease burden in terms of years lived with disability (YLDs) per 1000 people affected by conflict
We identified 129 studies published between Jan 1, 1980, and Aug 9, 2017, providing 96 studies with prevalence estimates for post-traumatic stress disorder, 70 studies with prevalence estimates for depression, and 38 studies with prevalence estimates for any anxiety disorder; 51 of these were studies published between Jan 1, 2000, and Aug 9, 2017. 39 countries were represented in the dataset; 34 had data for depression, 34 had data for post-traumatic stress disorder, and 25 had data for anxiety
Summary
There are major conflict-induced humanitarian crises in numerous countries, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. UN estimates suggest that more than 68·6 million people worldwide have been forcibly displaced by violence and conflict, the highest number of people affected since World War 2.1 This increase in people affected by conflict coincides with a growing interest in mental health, as exemplified by the recently approved 10-year extension of the Mental Health Action Plan by 194 WHO member states.[2] Interest is especially high in the mental health of people affected by humanitarian emergencies.[3]. In 2005, WHO estimated the prevalence of mental disorders among people affected by humanitarian emergencies.[4] These estimates have been frequently repeated in policy documents,[3,5,6] news media,[7] and appeals and funding proposals for help for people living through the world’s worst crises. WHO’s 2005 estimates were not based on applicable systematic reviews of evidence
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
