Abstract
Nowadays, numerous tools, search engines, and medical aggregators are available on the Internet, but the biomedical community is still having difficulty accessing and retrieving information effectively. The aim of this survey was to analyze and evaluate PubMed third-party tools for optimizing biomedical information retrieval. Among the newest tools, the most respectful and close to PubMed configuration and structure were taken into consideration. A natural-language standard query, thrombocytopenia AND human AND hepatitis, was performed on five selected and classified PubMed third-party tools: SLIM, Anne O’Tate, Vivisimo or ClusterMed, Hubmed, and PubFocus. The results were evaluated according to the following criteria: accessibility, user friendliness, and answer timeliness. Three tools showed good results (three-star score), two were excellent (five-star score), and one was poor (two-star score). The syntactic and semantic correctness of the search strategies set and the proper use of the PubMed MeSH Terms cannot be ignored in biomedical searches using MEDLINE/PubMed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
