Abstract

Thanks to new conceptual and computational tools, the analysis of kinship and marriage networks has advanced considerably over the past twenty-five years. While in the past, the discussion of empirical marriage practices was often restricted to a casual observation of salient network features, it is now easy to produce a complete census of matrimonial circuits, both between individuals and between groups. However, the abundance of structural features which have thus become accessible raises a new question: to what extent can they be taken as indicators of sociological phenomena (such as marriage preferences or avoidances), rather than as effects of chance or of observer bias? This paper presents a series of recently developed simulation techniques that deal with this issue. Starting from a new approach to “classical” agent-based modeling of kinship and alliance (group) networks (Section 2), we then present an automatic model discovery technique which, instead of constructing alliance networks from given matrimonial rules, reconstructs plausible matrimonial rules underlying given alliance networks (Section 3). While these techniques apply to “objective” representations of kinship and alliance networks, we also present two methods that take into account the generally lacunar and biased character of empirical kinship datasets. The first method we propose to deal with this problem (Section 4) is a generalized version of White’s (1999) “reshuffling” approach, which consists in redistributing marriage or descent links between individuals or groups while keeping the numbers of links constant. (For alliance networks, the question can be dealt with analytically by straightforward calculation of expected marriage circuit frequencies.) The second method (Section 5) consists in simulating the processes of network exploration by a virtual fieldworker navigating through kinship or alliance networks according to given behavioral constraints.

Highlights

  • In the enterprise of confronting kinship theories with matrimonial practice, simulation techniques have, from the very beginning, played a central role

  • The first method we propose to deal with this problem (Section 4) is a generalized version of White’s (1999) “reshuffling” approach, which consists in redistributing marriage or descent links between individuals or groups while keeping the numbers of links constant. (For alliance networks, the question can be dealt with analytically by straightforward calculation of expected marriage circuit frequencies.) The second method (Section 5) consists in simulating the processes of network exploration by a virtual fieldworker navigating through kinship or alliance networks according to given behavioral constraints

  • The various simulation techniques presented in this paper serve a variety of different purposes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the enterprise of confronting kinship theories (and indigenous kinship norms) with matrimonial practice, simulation techniques have, from the very beginning, played a central role. Do numerous demographic and sociological factors (fertility and mortality rates, marriage and residence preferences, spatial distribution and migration, etc.) jointly affect the form of real-world kinship networks, the datasets collected by social scientists are generally subject to (often substantial) observer bias and cannot be taken as miniature images faithfully reproducing the morphology of the actual networks from which they are obtained. In this survey article, we discuss several recently developed simulation techniques designed to deal with the problem posed by the multiplicity of (agent- and observer-related) factors affecting the generation of kinship and marriage links. All the techniques presented in this article have been implemented in the open source software Puck.

The Framework
The Example Data Set
Straightforward Agent-Based Models
Alliance Networks: A Network Morphogenesis Model Based on Node Distance
Genealogical Networks: A Generalized Version of White’s Algorithm
Alliance Networks
Genealogical Networks
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.