Abstract
In the context of complex and unprecedented issues of global change, calls for new modes of knowledge production that are better equipped to address urgent challenges of global sustainability are increasingly frequent. This paper presents a case study of the new major research programme “Future Earth”, which aims to bring ‘research for global sustainability’ to the mainstream of global change research. A core principle of Future Earth is the co-production of knowledge with extra-scientific actors. In studying how the principle of co-production becomes institutionalised in the emerging structure of Future Earth, this paper points to the existence of three distinct rationales (logics) on the purpose and practice of co-production. Co-production is understood as a way to enhance scientific accountability to society (‘logic of accountability’), to ensure the implementation of scientific knowledge in society (‘logic of impact’), and to include the knowledge, perspectives and experiences of extra-scientific actors in scientific knowledge production (‘logic of humility’). This heterogeneous conception of knowledge co-production provides helpful ambiguity allowing actors with different perspectives on science and its role in society to engage in Future Earth. However, in the process of designing an institutional structure for Future Earth tensions between the different logics of co-production become apparent. This research shows how logics of accountability and impact are prominent in shaping the development of Future Earth. The paper concludes by pointing to an essential tension between being inclusive and transformative when it comes to institutionalising new modes of knowledge production in large research programmes.
Highlights
Introduction“The magnitude and urgency of the challenges facing humanity requires [ . . . ] a common coherent strategy of transdisciplinary research for global sustainability” (Belmont Forum, ICSU and International Social Science Council (ISSC), 2011; p. 1)
In the context of complex and unprecedented issues of global change, calls for new modes of knowledge production that are better equipped to address urgent challenges of global sustainability are increasingly frequent
The programme was launched at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development that took place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in June 2012 and intends to provide “the knowledge and support to accelerate our transformations to a sustainable world” (Future Earth, n.d.)
Summary
“The magnitude and urgency of the challenges facing humanity requires [ . . . ] a common coherent strategy of transdisciplinary research for global sustainability” (Belmont Forum, ICSU and ISSC, 2011; p. 1). The International Council for Science (ICSU), the International Social Science Council (ISSC) and the funding agencies united in the Belmont Forum announced their ambition to fundamentally change the practice, content and organization of global change research.. The International Council for Science (ICSU), the International Social Science Council (ISSC) and the funding agencies united in the Belmont Forum announced their ambition to fundamentally change the practice, content and organization of global change research.1 These ambitions have materialized in the major new global change research programme “Future Earth: Research for Global. I provide a brief review of the literature on intermediary organisations in science, and their role in supporting new modes of knowledge production. The paper concludes by pointing to the tensions between different logics of co-production that become apparent in Future Earth's re-orientation of global change research towards ‘research for global sustainability’
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.