Abstract
We have prepared and characterized four carboxylated Ru(II) phenanthroline complexes with different number of carboxyl groups, cis-dithiocyanato bis(4,7-dicarboxy-1,10-phenanthroline) ruthenium(II) [Ru(dcphen)2(NCS)2, DCP2], cis-dithiocyanato bis(4-monocarboxy-1,10-phenanthroline) ruthenium(II) [Ru(mcphen)2(NCS)2, MCP2], cis-dithiocyanato (4,7-dicarboxy-1,10-phenanthroline) (1,10-phenanthroline) ruthenium(II) [Ru(dcphen)(phen)(NCS)2, DCPP], and cis-dithiocyanato (4-monocarboxy-1,10-phenanthroline)(1,10-phenanthroline) ruthenium(II) [Ru(mcphen)(phen)(NCS)2, MCPP], as photosensitizers for nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells. All complexes exhibit a broad MLCT absorption band around 500 nm in ethanol and an emission band around 700 nm in ethanol–methanol (4:1) at 77 K. The excited state lifetime of these complexes at 77 K was 1.5–2.9 μs and the oxidation potential, 0.90–1.12 V vs. NHE, was obtained by cyclic voltammetry in solution. The best solar-energy-to-electric conversion efficiency under AM 1.5 irradiation was obtained for DCPP which has two carboxyl groups on one phenanthroline ligand. The performance of photosensitizer of MCPP which has only one carboxyl group is lower than that for the other complexes, indicating that the number of carboxyl groups as anchor is very important for efficient solar cell performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.