Abstract
Stateless nationalist and regionalist parties are no longer niche players but part of the mainstream of west European party politics. Yet their significance has yet to penetrate the mainstream of scholarship in political science on parties and elections. This contribution explores why this is so, focusing on a pattern of methodological and geographical fragmentation of research on sub-state party competition which has limited the resonance of that research. But it also sets out areas where this is changing—most notably in the growing combination of sociological and institutional approaches, but also in the study of stateless nationalist and regionalist parties as parties of government, often challenging, at times partnering state-wide parties. The resulting intersection of state-wide and sub-state logics of party competition suggests an opportunity for rethinking what ‘mainstream’ means in understanding party competition in multi-level states.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.