New photographic techniques for clinical evaluation of acne

Abstract

AbstractClinical evaluation of acne is usually based on direct visual assessment and ordinary flash photography, both of which are compromised by viewer subjectivity. It is difficult to accurately assess individual acne lesions and to observe early response to therapy. Standard flash photography has inherent limitations owing to the physics of light; it does not permit consistent visualization of subtle cutaneous characteristics like erythema or microcomedones, and it tends to blur distinctions between active inflammatory lesions and older hyperpigmented macules.Over the last decade there has been increasing interest in newer techniques aimed at increasing the accuracy and objectivity of acne evaluation. These include parallel‐polarized light photography, cross (or perpendicular)‐polarized light photography, videomicroscopy, and fluorescence photography. This article will review the advances of the past decade and summarize new techniques to evaluate acne lesions. Moreover, findings of a study that evaluated the course of individual acne lesions and the effects of adapalene gel 0.1% on inflammatory and non‐inflammatory acne lesions will be viewed.In this study, the use of parallel‐polarized and cross‐polarized photography, in combination with videomicroscopy and sebum production measurement, provided objective, detailed information on the evolution of different variable acne lesions and their response to adapalene gel 0.1%. Adapalene treatment produced rapid resolution of inflammatory and non‐inflammatory lesions, and inhibited formation of new lesions. Sebum secretion rates also declined during treatment. Use of the new assessment techniques proved to be a valuable, non‐invasive and reliable method of assessing acne vulgaris and its response to treatment.