Abstract
Adaptation strategies to climate change need information about present and future climatic conditions. However, next to scenarios about the future climate, scenarios about future vulnerability are essential, since also changing societal conditions fundamentally determine adaptation needs. At the international and national level, first initiatives for developing vulnerability scenarios and so-called shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) have been undertaken. Most of these scenarios, however, do not provide sufficient information for local scenarios and local climate risk management. There is an urgent need to develop scenarios for vulnerability at the local scale in order to complement climate change scenarios. Heat stress is seen as a key challenge in cities in the context of climate change and further urban growth. Based on the research project ZURES (ZURES 2020 website), the paper presents a new method for human vulnerability scenarios to heat stress at the very local scale for growing medium-sized cities. In contrast to global models that outline future scenarios mostly with a country-level resolution, we show a new method on how to develop spatially specific scenario information for different districts within cities, starting from the planned urban development and expansion. The method provides a new opportunity to explore how different urban development strategies and housing policies influence future human exposure and vulnerability. Opportunities and constraints of the approach are revealed. Finally, we discuss how these scenarios can inform future urban development and risk management strategies and how these could complement more global or national approaches.
Highlights
Adaptation strategies towards climate change and heat stress oftentimes focus on present and future climatic conditions, without considering sufficiently human vulnerability and changing future socio-economic or demographic conditions
We calculated that the planned social housing units in the new urban areas will be occupied by SGB II recipients and therewith the scenario includes a moderate increase of SGB II recipients in these districts
In line with other risk definitions that account for both—the hazard and the human vulnerability—we assume that once climate heat stress is zero or vice versa human vulnerability to heat stress is zero, there is no risk
Summary
Adaptation strategies towards climate change and heat stress oftentimes focus on present and future climatic conditions, without considering sufficiently human vulnerability and changing future socio-economic or demographic conditions. This article is part of a topical collection on Risk & Vulnerability to Extreme Events: Dynamics and Future Scenarios
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.