Abstract

In their origins Einstein’s studies of relativity principles called into question the validity of important assumptions that had previously been made in formulating physical theories, assumptions made without investigation into alternatives. Examples of this include notions of absolute time and space, flat Euclidean geometry, and trivial topology. In this paper, we review an intermediate niche, differentiable (smooth) structure, which must be defined between topology and geometry. We now know that this choice need not be trivial. Just as it seemed for centuries to be obvious that space should be flat, so it would seem until recently that standard, trivial, smoothness for spacetime is the only choice. We now know that this is not true. In this paper we review these topics in the light of very surprising and often counter-intuitive mathematical discoveries of the last 20 years or so. Since our regions of observability are necessarily constrained we do not have any a priori justification for extending standard smoothness globally. This opens up the possibility of non-standard extension of solutions to field equations to exotically smooth regions, leading to examples such as exotic black holes and exotic cosmological models.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.