Abstract

Spectral Counts approaches (SpCs) are largely employed for the comparison of protein expression profiles in label-free (LF) differential proteomics applications. Similarly, to other comparative methods, also SpCs based approaches require a normalization procedure before Fold Changes (FC) calculation. Here, we propose new Complexity Based Normalization (CBN) methods that introduced a variable adjustment factor (f), related to the complexity of the sample, both in terms of total number of identified proteins (CBN(P)) and as total number of spectral counts (CBN(S)). Both these new methods were compared with the Normalized Spectral Abundance Factor (NSAF) and the Spectral Counts log Ratio (Rsc), by using standard protein mixtures. Finally, to test the robustness and the effectiveness of the CBNs methods, they were employed for the comparative analysis of cortical protein extract from zQ175 mouse brains, model of Huntington Disease (HD), and control animals (raw data available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD017471). LF data were also validated by western blot and MRM based experiments. On standard mixtures, both CBN methods showed an excellent behavior in terms of reproducibility and coefficients of variation (CVs) in comparison to the other SpCs approaches. Overall, the CBN(P) method was demonstrated to be the most reliable and sensitive in detecting small differences in protein amounts when applied to biological samples.

Highlights

  • In recent years, Proteomics has gained centrality in Omics studies for basic and translational applications, especially for diagnostic purposes and for targeted and/or personalized medicine [1,2,3]

  • The new formula (1) employed for SpCs normalization is reported as follows in comparison with the Normalized Spectra Abundance Factor (NSAF) (2) and the Spectral Counts log Ratio (RSC) (3) methods

  • The obtained Fold Change (FC) cutoffs were summarized in Table 1: These findings showed very similar results for Complexity Based Normalization (CBN)(S), Rsc, and NSAF, while CBN(P) performed quite differently

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proteomics has gained centrality in Omics studies for basic and translational applications, especially for diagnostic purposes and for targeted and/or personalized medicine [1,2,3]. New label free methods for protein relative quantification

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.