Abstract

The International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) of stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis found a higher incidence of stroke within 30 days of stenting compared with endarterectomy. We aimed to compare the rate of ischaemic brain injury detectable on MRI between the two groups. Patients with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis enrolled in ICSS were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy. Of 50 centres in ICSS, seven took part in the MRI substudy. The protocol specified that MRI was done 1-7 days before treatment, 1-3 days after treatment (post-treatment scan), and 27-33 days after treatment. Scans were analysed by two or three investigators who were masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was the presence of at least one new ischaemic brain lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on the post-treatment scan. Analysis was per protocol. This is a substudy of a registered trial, ISRCTN 25337470. 231 patients (124 in the stenting group and 107 in the endarterectomy group) had MRI before and after treatment. 62 (50%) of 124 patients in the stenting group and 18 (17%) of 107 patients in the endarterectomy group had at least one new DWI lesion detected on post-treatment scans done a median of 1 day after treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.21, 95% CI 2.78-9.79; p<0.0001). At 1 month, there were changes on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences in 28 (33%) of 86 patients in the stenting group and six (8%) of 75 in the endarterectomy group (adjusted OR 5.93, 95% CI 2.25-15.62; p=0.0003). In patients treated at a centre with a policy of using cerebral protection devices, 37 (73%) of 51 in the stenting group and eight (17%) of 46 in the endarterectomy group had at least one new DWI lesion on post-treatment scans (adjusted OR 12.20, 95% CI 4.53-32.84), whereas in those treated at a centre with a policy of unprotected stenting, 25 (34%) of 73 patients in the stenting group and ten (16%) of 61 in the endarterectomy group had new lesions on DWI (adjusted OR 2.70, 1.16-6.24; interaction p=0.019). About three times more patients in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group had new ischaemic lesions on DWI on post-treatment scans. The difference in clinical stroke risk in ICSS is therefore unlikely to have been caused by ascertainment bias. Protection devices did not seem to be effective in preventing cerebral ischaemia during stenting. DWI might serve as a surrogate outcome measure in future trials of carotid interventions. UK Medical Research Council, the Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, European Union, Netherlands Heart Foundation, and Mach-Gaensslen Foundation.

Highlights

  • Percutaneous stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for the treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis

  • We aimed to compare the risk of procedural ischaemia and persistent infarction on MRI between patients randomly allocated to receive stenting or endarterectomy and to investigate the effect of cerebral protection devices on the risk of ischaemia associated with stenting

  • Randomisation and masking Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive stenting or endarterectomy by use of a computerised service provided by the Oxford Clinical Trials Service Unit staff who were not involved in other parts of the trial

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Percutaneous stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for the treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis. The risk of procedural stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within the first 120 days after randomisation was significantly higher with stenting than with surgery (intention-to-treat analysis 8·5% vs 5·2%, p=0·006), as was the risk within 30 days of treatment in the per-protocol analysis (7·4% vs 4·0%, p=0·003). This difference was mainly caused by a higher number of non-disabling strokes in the stenting group (36 vs 11 within 30 days of treatment); the rate of disabling stroke or death did not differ significantly (26 vs 18). We aimed to compare the risk of procedural ischaemia and persistent infarction on MRI between patients randomly allocated to receive stenting or endarterectomy and to investigate the effect of cerebral protection devices on the risk of ischaemia associated with stenting

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call