Abstract

Green supplier evaluation and selection plays a crucial role in the green supply chain management of any organization to reduce the purchasing cost of materials and increase the flexibility and quality of products. An interval neutrosophic set (INS)—which is a generalization of fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFS) and neutrosophic sets (NS)—can better handle the incomplete, indeterminate and inconsistent information than the other sets. This paper proposes a new integrated Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in support of the green supplier evaluation and selection process. In the proposed approach, INS is used to assess the relative importance of the characteristics that the purchased product should have (internal variables “WHATs”) in order to satisfy the company’s needs, the relevant supplier assessment criteria (external variables “HOWs”), the “HOWs”-“WHATs” correlation scores, the resulting weights of the “HOWs” and the impact of each potential supplier. The normalized weighted rating is then defined and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is developed to obtain a final ranking of green suppliers. A case study is applied to demonstrate the efficiency and computational procedure of the proposed method.

Highlights

  • The selection of the right suppliers is among the important supply chain issues for making company operations efficient [1]

  • This study proposes a new integrated Quality Function Deployment (QFD)-based interval neutrosophic set (INS) for supporting the green supplier evaluation and selection process

  • The relative importance of the “WHATs,” the “HOWs”-“WHATs” correlation scores, the weights of the “HOWs,” and the impact of each potential supplier were assessed in INS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The selection of the right suppliers is among the important supply chain issues for making company operations efficient [1]. Despite the growing work of green supplier selection, existent studies have focused on aspects of supplier selection in terms of some internal criteria in general. External criteria, such as customer opinions or requirements (CRs), have not been considered [1]. Most studies have focused only on the economic efficiency of suppliers rather than the environmental issues in the supplier selection process [5]. The application of the environmental science to conserve the natural environment and resources

Preliminary
QFD Model Development Using Interval Neutrosophic Sets
Determine Each Potential Supplier Impact on the Attributes Considered “HOWs”
Normalize the Averaged Ratings
Determine the Standardized Weighted Rating
Find the Closeness Coefficient and Ranking Order of Alternatives
Application of the Proposed Model for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection
Aggregate the “HOWs”-“WHATs” Correlation Scores
H VH VH H
H VH H VH
Find the Closeness Coefficient and Ranking Order of Each Supplier
Discussion and Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.