New Instrument Performance Models for Combined Wellbore Surveys Facilitate Optimal Use of Survey Information

Abstract

Abstract In order to determine confidently the path of a wellbore, established practice involves the collection of multiple survey data using the various methods that are available to the industry, such as measurement while drilling methods, using either magnetic or gyroscopic measurements, or surveys taken after a section of the wellbore has been completed, normally using gyro tools. The survey deemed to be of the highest precision, based on published survey system error models, is commonly selected to be the "definitive survey" for that section of the well and all other data is discarded. However, by combining multiple data sets through the use of survey averaging techniques, it is possible to obtain a more accurate estimate of wellbore position. Having generated a "combined survey" by such an averaging method, i.e. a survey generated by combining two or more surveys that may be of the same or different type, it is then required to quantify the accuracy of that survey. This may be expressed in the usual manner as a sequence of error ellipsoids at intervals along the path of the well. At present, however, this can only be done by rigorous calculations analogous to the survey averaging itself. This is a complex analysis, which is one important reason why survey averaging has not been generally implemented and adopted as a standard analysis practice. Error models for individual survey tools are usually specified in terms of Instrument Performance Model (IPM) files in accordance with methods and procedures derived through the work of the SPE Well Positioning Technical Section. The IPM files, along with wellbore trajectory data, form the inputs to standard error model software packages through which survey uncertainty is calculated to a specified level of confidence. This paper demonstrates how new IPM files can be generated for combined surveys. The error analysis resulting from the new IPM file is shown to be consistent with the results obtained through the rigorous mathematical analysis of the individual surveys. The introduction of new IPM files offers an easy and efficient method for operators to utilize all available survey information in a consistent manner. This may help to optimize the surveying program, with implications for both positional uncertainty assessment and safety aspects. Furthermore, the improvement in the positional data as well as the reduced uncertainty that can be achieved by combining surveys is a great advantage when considering small targets, very long extended reach wells, and highly congested fields in general, as it might turn unfeasible projects into achievable ones.