Abstract
Due to the high abundance and low cost of the sodium (Na), Na-ion batteries are an alternative to lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries for large-scale energy storage, such as electric vehicles and stationary storage for renewable energies. Similar to the successful lithium intercalation chemistry, Na-ion batteries have recalled much attention recently and a significant achievement have been made. However, the large size of the ionic diameter and ionization potential of the Na ions make it difficult in structural stability and ion diffusion, usually resulting in different reaction mechanisms1. Transition metal dichalcogenides MS2 (M=Mo, W) and their intercalated compounds belong to a large class of the so-called 2D layered solids. The layers of these materials consist of three interconnected, hexagonally coordinated atomic sheets (S-Mo-S)2. The weak interlayer van der Waals force permits the possible intercalation of some foreign atoms between the layers, such as alkali metal. Li-ion intercalated MoS2 (LixMoS2) has been widely explored and known as intercalation (x<0.5), 2H-1T phase transition (0.5<x<1) and conversion (x>1)3. However, few studies have been focused on the structural change of the host when Na ions are inserted into the MoS2 lattice. Moreover, the electrochemical performance of MoS2for Na-ion insertion needs to be improved. In this work, in situ and ex situ techniques were combined to monitor the structural changes of MoS2 at atomic levels at various intercalation stages and recognize the reaction products. By optimizing the binder and the cut-off potential, we improve the cycling performance of MoS2 for Na-ion battery by a large margin. When discharged to 0.2 V, the cell shows an initial discharge capacity of 241 mAh g-1 and maintains at 165 mAh g-1 after 70 cycles. However, intercalation of too many Na ions in the host leads to the decomposition of MoS2 into metallic Mo and NaxS2 (x£2). The performance of the cell becomes deteriorated in the subsequent cycles due to large volume expansion and the electrolyte reduction at low potentials (0.01 V) though a reversible capacity up to 440 mAh g-1 can be obtained.(1) Palomares, V.; Serras, P.; Villaluenga, I.; Hueso, K. B.; Carretero-Gonzalez, J.; Rojo, T. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5884-5901.(2) Zak, A.; Feldman, Y.; Lyakhovitskaya, V.; Leitus, G.; Popovitz-Biro, R.; Wachtel, E.; Cohen, H.; Reich, S.; Tenne, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4747-4758.(3) Fang, X. P.; Hua, C. X.; Guo, X. W.; Hu, Y. S.; Wang, Z. X.; Gao, X. P.; Wu, F.; Wang, J. Z.; Chen, L. Q. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 81, 155-160.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.