Abstract

Tailoring the mechanical properties of parts by influencing the solidification conditions is a key topic of powder bed fusion. Depending on the application, single crystalline, columnar, or equiaxed microstructures are desirable. To produce single crystals or equiaxed microstructures, the control of nucleation is of outstanding importance. Either it should be avoided or provoked. There are also applications, such as turbine blades, where both microstructures at different locations are required. Here, we investigate nucleation at the melt-pool border during the remelting of CMSX-4® samples built using powder bed fusion. We studied the difference between remelting as-built and homogenized microstructures. We identified two new mechanisms that led to grain formation at the beginning of solidification. Both mechanisms involved a change in the solidification microstructure from the former remelted and newly forming material. For the as-built samples, a discrepancy between the former and new dendrite arm spacing led to increased interdentritic undercooling at the beginning of solidification. For the heat-treated samples, the collapse of a planar front led to new grains. To identify these mechanisms, we conducted experimental and numerical investigations. The identification of such mechanisms during powder bed fusion is a fundamental prerequisite to controlling the solidification conditions to produce single crystalline and equiaxed microstructures.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe production of parts with suitable mechanical properties is a prerequisite for manufacturing processes

  • We examined new grain formation in single-melt lines and offset hatching produced on top of single crystalline CMSX-4® samples built by powder bed fusion (PBF)-EB

  • The single lines were melted into as-built as well as heat-treated samples to investigate the influence of remelting segregated microstructures on nucleation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The production of parts with suitable mechanical properties is a prerequisite for manufacturing processes. Since the rise of additive manufacturing techniques, such as powder bed fusion (PBF), great efforts have been undertaken to understand and control mechanical properties based on process parameters [1,2,3,4]. PBF gives the opportunity to adjust the microstructure and, the mechanical properties in a broad range. In addition to the usual columnar structures, single crystalline [5,6,7] and equiaxed microstructures [2,8,9,10,11] can be produced and changed within one part [10]. The interactions between the process parameters and solidification behavior needs to be understood in detail

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.