Abstract

The Oktyabr’skoe deposit in the Norilsk ore district is the largest platinum-copper-nickel deposit in the world. It contains a huge main orebody (2.4 km3) of massive sulfide ores and some smaller sulfide bodies. Almost all publications on this deposit are devoted to the main orebody. However, to solve the problems of the deposit genesis, it is necessary to take into account the geological structure of the entire area and the composition of all orebodies. For the first time we present data on the inner structure, geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of the intrusive body, and related the disseminated and massive sulfide ores (orebody number C-5) in the northeastern flank of the deposit. The intrusion studied in the core of the borehole RG-2 consists of several horizons including the following rock varieties (from bottom to top): olivine gabbro-dolerites, taxitic gabbro-dolerites, picritic gabbro-dolerites, troctolites, olivine-free gabbro-dolerites, ferrogabbro, and leucogabbro. The intrusion shows a strong differentiated inner structure where high-Mg rocks (up to 25 wt.% MgO troctolites and picritic gabbro-dolerites) in the bottom are associated with low-Mg rocks (6–7 wt.%, gabbro-dolerites, leucogabbro, ferrogabbro) without intermediate differentiated members (8–12 wt.% MgO olivine gabbro-dolerites). Rocks are characterized by low TiO2 content (≤1 wt.%). Taxitic gabbro-dolerites, picritic gabbro-dolerites, and troctolites contain disseminated sulfide chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite mineralization (32 m thick). Cu and Ni concentrations reach up 0.74 and 0.77 wt.%, respectively. Massive ores (27 m) occur in the bottom part of the intrusion. The ores consist of pentlandite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite, the latter mineral dominates. Their chemical composition is stable: Cu/Ni ~1, Pd/Pt varies from 5 to 6. The C-5 orebody is similar to the C-3 orebody in terms of mineral and chemical compositions, and differ from the nearby the C-4 orebody which is characterized by a Cu/Ni ratio changing from 5 to 8. On the basis of geochemical and mineralogical data, it is assumed that orebodies C-3 and C-5 are associated with one intrusion, while the orebody number C-4 is related to another intrusive body. Thus, the deposit has a more complex structure and includes several more intrusions than is usually considered.

Highlights

  • This article is an open access articleThe NW Siberian flood basalts province contains numerous ultrabasic-basic intrusions with platinum group elements (PGE)-Cu-Ni mineralization [1,2,3,4]

  • The Oktyabr’skoe deposit is the largest known deposit in the Norilsk district, which has been of interest to geologists due to the extent of its sulfide orebodies and its mineralogical diversity

  • Many new minerals were discovered in the main orebody, such as talnakhite, pollyarite, sobolevskite, among others [10,11,12,13,14,15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The NW Siberian flood basalts province contains numerous ultrabasic-basic intrusions with platinum group elements (PGE)-Cu-Ni mineralization [1,2,3,4]. The Talnakh and Oktyabrsk’oe deposits were initially thought to be genetically related to a single intrusive body (the Talnakh intrusion) consisting of the northeastern, southwestern, and northwestern branches [8,26] Further studies related these deposits to two separate massifs: Talnakh and Kharaelakh [17,18] formed from different magmas intruded at different stratigraphic levels, i.e., Carboniferous-Permian and Devonian deposits, respectively. Despite little evidence, speculated that the deposit was formed by multiple magmatic events [28,29] They did not publish geochemical and mineralogical data on individual orebodies that could confirm their relation to different intrusions. We present new data on the C-5 orebody, which has a composition similar to the C-3 orebody They are both represented by tetragonal chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite assemblages, while the C-4 orebody, located in close vicinity, consists of Cu minerals with S deficits in mineral structure (talnakhite) and must be formed under other physics–chemical conditions. This is the first attempt to demonstrate the complex structure of the NE flank of the Oktyabr’skoe deposit, revealing its complicated formation history

Geology of the Norilsk District and the Oktyabr’skoe Deposit
Schematic
Materials and Methods
ICP masswas spectrometer
Results
The Distribution of Major Components
Mineral Composition
Chemical Composition of Ore
Discussion
Intrusive Rocks
Massive Ore
Suggestions on Genetic Model
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call