Abstract
This article examines the influence of constructivism on models of assessment that are relevant for special education as well as general education. Discussion focuses on the diversity of assessment approaches that have been influenced by constructivist epistemology and the varying degrees to which different assessment systems incorporate constructivist principles. Selected assessment procedures are discussed, ranging from standardized systems to structured, informal assessment systems and unstructured assessment procedures that are reminiscent of Piaget's clinical method. Discussion focuses on new assessment procedures that incorporate selected features of a constructivist philosophy (1) They are holistic, dynamic, and multidimensional in scope. (2) They account for the complex interactions among development and the curriculum. (3) They address metacognitive processes and strategic learning. (4) They are continuous with instruction. Assessment approaches that incorporate some or all of these characteristics have highlighted the problems associated with traditional methods of assessment, but the new approaches have raised new problems: practicality, cost-effectiveness, accountability, reliability, and validity. If we are to judge the merits of these new directions in assessment, we must be patient and willing to accept ambiguities.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
