Abstract

The uncemented glenoid implants in total anatomical shoulder arthroplasty are likely to be accused of problems like dissociations, secondary rotator cuff tear, and wear of polyethylene (PE). This work is a clinical and radiological prospective review of 143 cases of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty using a new metal back uncemented glenoid implant (MB) in order to see if this new implant induces those complications. A total of 143 cases were operated between 2003 and 2011. In a first part, the whole series of 143 cases was radiologically studied in order to quantify the lateralisation induced by the MB implant. In a second study, 37 cases had a mean follow-up of 38 months (24–75, mean 32) and served for the clinical and radiological final study. Pre- and postoperative clinical evaluation was done using the Constant–Murley score and the simple shoulder test from Matsen. The final X-rays served to detect an eventual secondary narrowing of the joint space and to analyse the frequency of radio lucent lines (RLL) and loosenings. Despite a small radiological lateralisation in comparison with the normal contralateral side (0.36 cm, p = 0.02), the clinical results after 2 years were similar to the published cemented glenoid implants series but without any RLL, glenoid loosening or joint narrowing. Some dissociations occured in the beginning and definitely eliminated by a design modification of the PE tray. The discussion tried to show that, despite a still short follow-up, this series is encouraging to continue to use this new MB implant. Different applications of the concept of universality and conversion are discussed, this tray been also the support of a glenosphere in reverse arthroplasty.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe gold standard technique for glenoid replacement in total anatomical shoulder prosthesis is still the use of full polyethylene cemented implant like Neer concept 40 years ago [1]

  • The gold standard technique for glenoid replacement in total anatomical shoulder prosthesis is still the use of full polyethylene cemented implant like Neer concept 40 years ago [1].The main problem is glenoid loosening

  • The uncemented glenoid implants in total anatomical shoulder arthroplasty are likely to be accused of problems like dissociations, secondary rotator cuff tear, and wear of polyethylene (PE)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The gold standard technique for glenoid replacement in total anatomical shoulder prosthesis is still the use of full polyethylene cemented implant like Neer concept 40 years ago [1]. Among them cementless glenoid devices have been tried, as much as the success of reverse prosthesis has obliged to develop metal back screwed glenoid trays, able to resist to the shear forces induced by a glenosphere [7]. These new uncemented implants in anatomical shoulder replacement have been greatly criticised, accused to be responsible of loosening, dissociation, and early PE wear. The excellent primary fixation of these screwed implants in reverse arthroplasty has led us to extend our indications to anatomical replacements, in order to see whether with this kind of design we are able to decrease the frequency of RLL observed with the cemented glenoids

Materials and methods
Results
Radiological results
Clinical results
Results after 24 months or more
Three revisions were recorded
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call