Abstract

Earthquake investigations confirm that un-symmetric buildings suffer more damage than their symmetric counterparts. Torsional vibrations due to irregularity are one of the main factors which cause damage to buildings. Seismic codes include provisions to consider the torsional vibrations in the design of structures. However, the design of the stiff side elements may be unconservative. In this study, a total of 15 Dual system buildings were analyzed using nonlinear dynamic analysis to propose a new definition for torsional irregularity considering the effects of plan asymmetry on the earthquake response of mid-rise dual system buildings. Based on the analysis results, two new equations were derived using nonlinear regression analysis to check the torsional irregularity and the torsional amplification. Afterward, the proposed torsional irregularity provisions were compared with the torsional irregularity provisions of Europe code (EC-8), Japanese code & ASCE 7-16 code, and the results indicate that the torsional irregularity provisions of all the codes are unconservative. The current investigation proposes new equations to be used in the existing codes for torsional irregularity design considerations to improve the accuracy of the current codes' torsional irregularity provisions.

Highlights

  • IntroductionEarthquake events show that buildings with configuration irregularity are more vulnerable to earthquake damages

  • This study performs a parametric investigation on Dual system buildings using nonlinear dynamic analysis to propose a new definition for torsional irregularity based on rigid floor rotations

  • The torsional irregularity provisions of the proposed equations compared with the torsional irregularity provisions of Europe code (EC-8), Japanese code & ASCE 7-16 code, and the following points are concluded: Fig. 34 Comparison of floor rotations — floor number for (DS-3-1, DS-3-2, and DS-3-3, and DS-3-4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

IntroductionEarthquake events show that buildings with configuration irregularity are more vulnerable to earthquake damages. The effects of plan asymmetry on the earthquake response of the structures were the subject of many studies (e.g., Bozorgnia and Tso (1986) [4]; Chopra and Goel (1991). The effects of plan asymmetry on the earthquake response of onestory system structure designed by various codes and how well the torsional provisions. Alaa et al Journal of Engineering and Applied Science (2022) 69:12 in building codes represent these effects were the subject of many studies (e.g., Chopra and Goel (1991) [6]; Rutenberg (1992) [7]; Wong and Tso (1995) [8]; HUMAR and KUMAR (2000) [9]; HUMAR and KUMAR (2004) [10]). Numerical results showed that combining the FRP wrapping approach and R/C jacketing applied to the selected columns significantly improved the structure's seismic performance, increasing strength, stiffness, and ductility [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call