Abstract
The purpose is to describe the most recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that had a noninferiority design, and to focus on methodological aspects of noninferiority. In 2014 and 2015 10 different RCTs with a noninferiority-design could be identified, in comparison to only a few in the decade before. Most RCTs had a rather small sample size, and had ill-defined noninferiority-margins, or noninferiority-margins without comprehensible clinical meaning. Six of the 10 trials indeed arrived at a conclusion of 'noninferiority'; four did not. Interestingly, many of the RCTs were pragmatic studies comparing strategies, and the investigators were neither blind to the treatment nor to the outcome. In addition, the treatments were often adaptive (e.g. treat-to-target approach). These characteristics are considered built-in incentives for noninferiority. In the competitive pharmaceutical landscape of rheumatoid arthritis, with many effective drugs and strategies, it is no surprise that the number of noninferiority-trial (sharply) rises. But noninferiority trials are difficult to design, conduct, and interpret, and many principles of noninferiority-trial designs are currently ignored, which may jeopardise their conclusions to some extent.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
