Abstract

AbstractDevelopment of the numerical contact algorithms for finite element method usually concerns convergence, mesh dependency, etc. Verification of the numerical contact algorithm usually includes only a few cases due to a limited number of available analytic solutions (e.g., the Hertz solution for cylindrical surfaces). The solution of the generalized Euler–Eytelwein, or the belt friction problem is a stand alone task, recently formulated for a rope laying in sliding equilibrium on an arbitrary surface, opens up to a new set of benchmark problems for the verification of rope/beam to surface/solid contact algorithms. Not only a pulling forces ratio , but also the position of a curve on a arbitrary rigid surface withstanding the motion in dragging direction should be verified. Particular situations possessing a closed form solution for ropes and rigid surfaces are analyzed. The verification study is performed employing the specially developed Solid‐Beam finite element with both linear and ‐continuous approximations together with the Curve‐to‐Solid Beam (CTSB) contact algorithm and exemplary employing commercial finite element software. A crucial problem of "contact locking" in contact elements showing stiff behavior despite the good convergence is identified. This problem is resolved within the developed CTSB contact element.

Highlights

  • In many applications concerning the development of computational contact mechanics algorithms the researchers are dealing with a limited set of verification examples possessing analytical solutions

  • These conditions are forming an effective benchmark test for verification of the rope/beam to surface contact algorithm because only in the region near the great circle defined by Equation (34) equilibrium is possible, otherwise the rope/beam starts to slide in the dragging direction

  • The main goal of the current contribution—the analysis of the 3D generalized Euler–Eytelwein problem as a set of benchmark problems, which can be used for the verification of different Curve-To-Surface contact algorithms

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In many applications concerning the development of computational contact mechanics algorithms the researchers are dealing with a limited set of verification examples possessing analytical solutions. The Hertz problem, including friction becomes even more specific especially for rolling applications, see References 1,6 These solutions are widely used for verification and corresponding to two- or three-dimensional numerical models resp. A standalone problem for objects of different nature is the frictional contact between a rope and a cylinder initially formulated by Leonhard Euler as the 2D problem and published in "Remarks on the effect of friction on equilibrium".7 This problem after popularization by Eytelwein in his text book[8] nowadays is known as the Euler–Eytelwein problem or the belt friction problem as well as the Euler formula for rope friction. This set is formulated as frictional contact between a rigid surface of various geometry and a rope with particular geometry laying on this surface in equilibrium

GENERALIZED EULER–EYTELWEIN PROBLEM
Limit values of the tangential pulling forces
Specifications of the critical case for the finite element verification
A rope as a helix on a cylinder
A rope as a circle on a cone
A rope as a geodesic line on a cone
A rope as a circle on a sphere
Limit values of the tangential forces
OVERVIEW OF THE CTSB CONTACT ALGORITHM
VERIFICATION OF SPECIAL CASES
Computation in commercial software package ANSYS
Computation employing the CTSB contact algorithm in FEAP
Node generations for the solid-beam finite element
Modeling a rope using beam and solid-beam finite elements
Penalty Method
A rope as the circle on a cone
Findings
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.