Abstract

In this paper, we study a customer order scheduling problem where a number of orders, composed of several product types, have to be scheduled on a set of parallel machines, each one capable to process a single product type. The objective is to minimise the sum of the completion times of the orders, which is related to the lead time perceived by the customer, and also to the minimisation of the work-in-process. This problem has been previously studied in the literature, and it is known to be NP-hard even for two product types. As a consequence, the interest lies on devising approximate procedures to obtain fast, good performing schedules. Among the different heuristics proposed for the problem, the ECT (Earliest Completion Time) heuristic by Leung et al. [6] has turned to be the most efficient constructive heuristic, yielding excellent results in a wide variety of settings. These authors also propose a tabu search procedure that constitutes the state-of-the-art metaheuristic for the problem. We propose a new constructive heuristic based on a look-ahead mechanism. The computational experience conducted shows that it clearly outperforms ECT, while having both heuristics the same computational complexity. Furthermore, we propose a greedy search algorithm using a specific neighbourhood that outperforms the existing tabu search procedure for different stopping criteria, both in terms of quality of solutions and of required CPU effort.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.