Abstract
Two alternative modifications of the experimental protocol for the heritable translocation test are described. One of them proposes to mate F1 males and F1 females within one experimental group and eliminate normal pairs by a sequential decision procedure based on litter sizes. Pairs that do not meet the criteria for normal litter size have to be separated and tested against normal partners. Male translocation suspects are analyzed cytogenetically for presence of a reciprocal translocation. Female translocation suspects or XO suspects are verified through analysis of their male and female progeny. The second modification of the heritable translocation test omits fertility testing and proposes to cytogenetically analyze 25 diakineses-metaphases I from each F1 male in the test. Using either one or both protocols it was shown that 20 mg/kg of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) induced 1.3% heritable translocations in late spermatids and early spermatozoa. With 2.5 mg/kg of mitomycin C, 0.3% and 0.4% translocation carriers were recovered from treated primary spermatocytes and early spermatids, respectively. A dose of 300 R gamma rays resulted in 1.6% translocations in spermatozoa and 4.8% translocations in primary spermatocytes. The advantage of the modified fertility test lies in the doubling of the sample size by including the females. However, a disadvantage is the amount of time and labor that is necessary to verify female translocation carriers. The cytogenetic translocation test protocol with all F1 males is considered more reliable and faster. It lacks the possibility of error entailed in the decision procedure by fertility testing, and it requires less time, personnel, and animal space.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.