Abstract
The current study was aimed at providing a monetary assessment of households' preferences for basic and complementary health insurance based on willing to pay for health insurance coverage. The open-ended (OE), take-it-or-leave-it (TIOLI), and double-bounded dichotomous choice (DBDC) methods of contingent valuation (CV) were compared in calculating the participants' willingness to pay (WTP) for joining health insurance coverage. The data for the current study were taken from 2 equivalent samples of households. The (trimmed) mean of monthly WTP per person for basic health insurance coverage elicited by the OE, TIOLI, and DBDC methods was respectively US$ 4.01, US$ 6.2, and US$ 5.5. Moreover, the (trimmed) mean of monthly WTP per person for complementary health insurance elicited by the OE, TIOLI, and DBDC methods was respectively US$ 4.6, US$ 9.8, and US$ 8. The results indicated a significant value difference in the various CV approaches. The findings suggest that the TIOLI, OE, and DBDC can be used as an upper bounded, a lower bounded, and a median value respectively. The findings also suggest that the choice of different CV approaches is needed to estimate a boundary of WTP for health insurance plans as a more reliable estimate of stated preference of health insurance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The International journal of health planning and management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
