Abstract

Cerebral abscess is an emergency requiring urgent drainage via craniotomy or burrhole aspiration. We examine whether initial method of drainage affects outcome and important characteristics in patients with cerebral abscess. This is a retrospective analysis of 62 patients operated on in our unit with a loculated infected cerebral collection in the years 2003–2007 inclusive. Full statistical analysis was performed using data appropriate tests. Burrhole and craniotomy groups were evenly matched with no difference in any demographic factors. Surgical method made no difference to rate of re-operation (p = 0.276), antibiotic duration (p = 0.648), discharge GCS (p = 0.509), length of stay (p = 0.647) or GOS (p = 0.968). There was a trend to worsened outcome with delay to surgery (p = 0.132) with delayed patients requiring longer hospital stays (p ≤ 0.005). Patients requiring a longer antibiotic duration had worse outcomes (p ≤ 0.005). Surgical method did not have a significant effect on outcome, so burrhole aspiration with its advantages in terms of speed and scale of surgery should be strongly considered. Delay had an adverse affect, so operation should be as expeditious as possible whenever the differential diagnosis includes abscess, diagnosis of which may be aided by advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.