Abstract

Recent literature indicates that females are more resistant to shock-, trauma-, and sepsis-induced immune dysfunction and organ injury than are males. Consequently, using trauma-hemorrhagic shock (T/HS) and burn models, we tested whether the neutrophil response to trauma occurred in a sexually dimorphic fashion and, if so, the role of sex hormones. Neutrophil activation, as reflected by CD11b expression and respiratory burst activity, was increased to a greater extent in male rats than in female rats after T/HS or burn injury. Testosterone appeared to potentiate neutrophil activation, because castration reduced neutrophil activation, whereas ovariectomy had little effect. Mechanistically, this sexually dimorphic neutrophil response appeared to be due to both cellular and humoral factors. Evidence for a cellular difference between male and female neutrophils is based on the observation that naive female neutrophils were more resistant to activation by burn or T/HS plasma and lymph than naive male neutrophils and that this resistance varied over the estrus cycle. Additionally, the humoral environment was more neutrophil activating in male rats, because burn and T/HS plasma and lymph from male rats activated naive male neutrophils to a greater extent than comparable samples from females. Last, on the basis of in vitro experiments examining the effects of estrogen on calcium signaling, it appears that estrogen limits trauma-induced neutrophil activation, at least in part, by limiting the entry of calcium into the cell via store-operated calcium entry mechanisms. In conclusion, there is a striking sexual dimorphism in neutrophil responses after trauma, and these changes reflect both cellular resistance to activation as well as a less activating humoral environment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call