Abstract

We compare the discovery potential of the LHC for lepton number violating (LNV) signals with the sensitivity of current and future double beta decay experiments, assuming $0\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay is dominated by heavy particle exchange. We consider charged scalar, leptoquark and diquark mechanisms of $0\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay, covering the $0\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay operators with both, the smallest and largest, possible rates. We demonstrate, if $0\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay were found with a half-life below ${10}^{26}--{10}^{27}\text{ }\mathrm{\text{years}}$ a positive signal should show up at the LHC, except for some particular cases of the leptoquark mechanism, and vice versa, if the LHC does not find any hints for LNV, a ``short-range'' explanation for a finite $0\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay half-life will be ruled out in most cases. We argue, if a positive LNV signal were found at the LHC, it is possible to identify the dominant contribution to $0\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$. Two different kinds of observables which could provide such ``model discriminating'' power are discussed: different invariant mass peaks and the charge asymmetry.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call