Abstract

Restoring the overall mechanical alignment to neutral has been the gold standard in total knee arthroplasty since the 1970s. Recently, there has been renewed interest in alternative alignment goals that place implants in a more “physiologic” position with the hope of improving clinical outcomes. However, placing components outside of the classic “safe zone” of ± 3° is controversial, as studies have shown increased risk of mechanical failure, especially in obese patient populations. This paper will outline mechanical and kinematic alignment and present the evidence for why mechanical alignment is still the gold standard in total knee arthroplasty.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call