Abstract

The ligand precursors (MeOCH2CH2ImCH2CH2ImMe]X2 (X = Cl (2a), Br (2b)) were prepared from reaction of methoxyethylimidazole with a haloethylmethylimidazolium halide. Subsequent conversion to Ag2X2(MeOCH2CH2ImCH2CH2ImMe) (X = Cl (3a), Br (3b)) was achieved by treatment with Ag2O. Reaction of 3a or 3b with RuCl2(PPh3)3 (4) afforded RuCl2(PPh3)(MeOCH2CH2ImCH2CH2ImMe) (5). In a similar fashion treatment of 3a or 3b with RuCl2(═CHPh)(PCy3)2 gave the alkylidene complex RuCl2(═CHPh)(MeOCH2CH2ImCH2CH2ImMe) (6). In several standard metathesis tests 6 was shown to be a poor catalyst. The related ligand precursor [O(CH2CH2ImMe)2][Br]2 (7) was prepared, transformed to (AgBr)2[O(CH2CH2ImMe)2] (8) and reacted with RuCl2(═CHPh)(PCy3)2 to give RuCl2(═CHPh)[O(CH2CH2ImMe)2] (9). Reaction of 9 with B(C6F5)3 generated the cationic species 10, which was shown to be the dimer [RuCl(═CHPh)(O(CH2CH2ImMe)2)]2[ClB(C6F5)3]2 in the solid state. Compound 9 was also ineffective as a metathesis catalyst; however, 10 proved to be a moderately active metathesis catalyst at 45 and 80 °C in RCM, ROMP, and CM test reactions. Structural data for 3a, 5, 6, 9, and 10 are reported, and the implications of this work in catalyst development are considered.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.