Abstract

The Double Empathy Problem suggests that communicative difficulties between autistic and non-autistic people are due to bi-directional differences in communicative style and a reciprocal lack of understanding. If true, there should be increased similarity in interaction style, resulting in higher rapport during interactions between pairs of the same neurotype. Here, we provide two empirical tests of rapport, with data revealing whether self- and observer- rated rapport varies depending on the match or mismatch in autism status within a pair. An additional opportunity afforded by these data is to examine the effect of the autism status of the rater on the perceived rapport between matched and mismatched pairs. In Study 1 72 participants were allocated to one of three dyad conditions: autistic pairs (n = 24), non-autistic pairs (n = 24) and mixed pairs (n = 12 autistic; n = 12 non-autistic). Each participant completed three semi-structured interactions with their partner, rating rapport after each interaction. Non-autistic pairs experienced higher self-rated rapport than mixed and autistic pairs, and autistic pairs experienced higher rapport than mixed pairs. In Study 2 (n = 80) autistic and non-autistic observers rated interactional rapport while watching videoed interactions between autistic pairs, non-autistic pairs, and mixed pairs (n = 18, a subset of participants in Study 1). Mixed pairs were rated significantly lower on rapport than autistic and non-autistic pairs, and autistic pairs were rated more highly for rapport than non-autistic pairs. Both autistic and non-autistic observers show similar patterns in how they rate the rapport of autistic, non-autistic, and mixed pairs. In summary, autistic people experience high interactional rapport when interacting with other autistic people, and this is also detected by external observers. Rather than autistic people experiencing low rapport in all contexts, their rapport ratings are influenced by a mismatch of diagnosis. These findings suggest that autistic people possess a distinct mode of social interaction style, rather than demonstrating social skills deficits. These data are considered in terms of their implications for psychological theories of autism, as well as practical impact on educational and clinical practice.

Highlights

  • Rapport is defined by mutually experienced co-ordination, positivity, and attentiveness within a social interaction (TickleDegnen and Rosenthal, 1990)

  • The results indicate that participants, regardless of diagnostic status, give poorer ratings of rapport for mixed neurotype pairs than for matched neurotype pairs

  • A further common finding in both studies is that there were no differences in the pattern of rapport ratings between autistic raters and non-autistic raters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rapport is defined by mutually experienced co-ordination, positivity, and attentiveness within a social interaction (TickleDegnen and Rosenthal, 1990). It is marked by a harmony and affinity between two people (Bernieri, 2014), and is a key component in constructing and developing successful interpersonal interactions (Cappella, 1990). As rapport relates to the quality of a relationship between two people, it is distinct from many other psychological constructs which are situated within individuals, rather than within interactions (Bernieri, 2014). As difficulties with processing and expressing verbal and non-verbal social cues amongst autistic individuals have been well documented (BottemaBeutel et al, 2019; Sasson et al, 2020), we might expect this to subsequently impact upon their development of rapport with others

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call