Abstract

Background/AimsBioelectric nerve stimulation (eStim) is an emerging clinical paradigm that can promote nerve regeneration after trauma, including within the context of diabetes. However, its ability to prevent the onset of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) has not yet been evaluated. Beyond the nerve itself, DPN has emerged as a potential contributor to sarcopenia and bone disease; thus, we hypothesized that eStim could serve as a strategy to simultaneously promote neural and musculoskeletal health in diabetes.MethodsTo address this question, an eStim paradigm pre-optimized to promote nerve regeneration was applied to the sciatic nerve, which directly innervates the tibia and lower limb, for 8 weeks in control and streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetic (T1D) rats. Metabolic, gait, nerve and bone assessments were used to evaluate the progression of diabetes and the effect of sciatic nerve eStim on neuropathy and musculoskeletal disease, while also considering the effects of cuff placement and chronic eStim in otherwise healthy animals.ResultsRats with T1D exhibited increased mechanical allodynia in the hindpaw, reduced muscle mass, decreased cortical and cancellous bone volume fraction (BVF), reduced cortical bone tissue mineral density (TMD), and decreased bone marrow adiposity. Type 1 diabetes also had an independent effect on gait. Placement of the cuff electrode alone resulted in altered gait patterns and unilateral reductions in tibia length, cortical BVF, and bone marrow adiposity. Alterations in gait patterns were restored by eStim and tibial lengthening was favored unilaterally; however, eStim did not prevent T1D-induced changes in muscle, bone, marrow adiposity or mechanical sensitivity. Beyond this, chronic eStim resulted in an independent, bilateral reduction in cortical TMD.ConclusionOverall, these results provide new insight into the pathogenesis of diabetic neuroskeletal disease and its regulation by eStim. Though eStim did not prevent neural or musculoskeletal complications in T1D, our results demonstrate that clinical applications of peripheral neuromodulation ought to consider the impact of device placement and eStim on long-term skeletal health in both healthy individuals and those with metabolic disease. This includes monitoring for compounded bone loss to prevent unintended consequences including decreased bone mineral density and increased fracture risk.

Highlights

  • Therapeutic use of electrical stimuli, or bioelectric medicine, is ancient

  • In addition to the effect of diabetes, we considered the effects of sciatic nerve cuff placement and electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves (eStim) using threeway ANOVA (T1D × Cuff × eStim)

  • The foot-to-base angle (FBA) of the cuffed limb was partially restored in control and diabetic eStim groups to −3 ± 7 and −3 ± 13%, respectively, relative to the control side (Figure 4C). These results show a unilateral, detrimental effect of sciatic nerve cuffing on gait that is partially restored by eStim

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Therapeutic use of electrical stimuli, or bioelectric medicine, is ancient. Humans have exploited the responses of the body to electrical stimuli for medical treatment, starting with pain and expanding to increasingly complex disorders from hearing loss to paralysis (Chang, 2021). Electrical current delivered to nearby bone fractures can enhance healing outcomes (Aleem et al, 2016), and long, thin electrodes implanted near the spine or peripheral nerves can relieve chronic back or joint pain (Kapural et al, 2016; Ilfeld et al, 2019; Deer et al, 2021). Electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves (eStim) offers a unique opportunity to utilize the interconnectedness and regulatory function of the nervous system to treat diverse conditions throughout the body. One of the most widely applied therapeutics in bioelectric medicine today is vagus nerve stimulation. Promising results have been shown for both rheumatoid arthritis and obesity in using eStim to harness the anti-inflammatory and satietymediating functions of the vagus nerve (Koopman et al, 2016; Apovian et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call