Abstract
Discussions concerning the processes underlying the comprehension of sarcasm can be facilitated by research into brain-damaged participants. Acquired brain damage impairs certain cognitive processes, leaving others intact. The finding that patients with damage to the right hemisphere (RH) and patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) affecting frontal lobe function both find it difficult to comprehend sarcasm provides the opportunity to determine what aspects of the process they find difficult and what inferences are particularly problematic. RH patients have trouble processing information about the emotional state, intentions, and beliefs of the speaker. TBI patients' ability to understand sarcasm is independent of their ability to comprehend emotional state. They also find counterfactual inferences relatively straightforward. In contrast, they, too, appear to have trouble interpreting a speaker's intentions. The implications of these findings for theoretical discussions of the comprehension of sarcasm are briefly discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
