Abstract

Behavioural phenotype and autism-related traits of 38 patients affected by Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) were assessed using a specific neuropsychiatric protocol. Subsequently,we search for possible genotype-phenotype correlations comparing individuals with NIPBL variants and patients with negative molecular results. Firstly results showed a higher percentage of subjects with normal intellectual quotient (IQ) and borderline IQ; adaptive skills were lower than expected for age in all participants. 39.5% of the sample presented with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), NIPBL mutated individuals demonstrated a worse trend in comparison with the clinical diagnosis group. non-truncating individuals displayed no ASD and better communication abilities than truncating individuals. Findings increase our awareness of the strengths and weaknesses points in CdLS individuals.

Highlights

  • Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) is a rare genetic disorder and its phenotype clinical expression is widely variable

  • These findings should increase our awareness of the strengths and weaknesses points in CdLS individuals to guide appropriate targeted management; interventions addressing communicative impairments represent a clinical priority in CdLS patients

  • Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS, OMIM, #122470, #300590, #610759, #614701, #300882) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by peculiar facial dysmorphisms, major malformations, growth retardation, and developmental delay/intellectual disability with an estimated prevalence between 1 in 10,000 and 1 in 30,000 live births [Kline et al, 2007]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) is a rare genetic disorder and its phenotype clinical expression is widely variable. A kind of genetic gradient of severity for the other genes associated with CdLSp was presumed with HDAC8 gene at the top with a more classic and severe clinical presentation, and SMC3 gene at the bottom with a mild presentation. None of these correlations, are based on statistical analysis of a large cohort of patients

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call