Neuropharmacology of adrenergic neurons in teleost fish

Abstract

Although this brief review is based on relatively few types of experiments in few species of teleosts, it is possible to summarize some points of interest regarding the similarities and differences in the mechanisms of adrenergic neurotransmission in fish compared to the higher vertebrates. 1. There is a substantial mixing of cranial autonomic (“parasympathetic”) and spinal autonomic (“sympathetic”) pathways in the cranial nerves. This close relationship between the two systems and the differences in the nature of the neurons of cranial origin (cholinergic, and non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic) and spinal origin (adrenergic, cholinergic and mixed “polynergic”) gives a basis in fish also for a complex pattern of innervation of the various organs. 2. Adrenaline is the major transmitter substance in the adrenergic neurons of most teleosts studied, but there are exceptions within the same species. For instance, in the swimbladder mucosa of the cod, noradrenaline dominates, while adrenaline is the major catecholamine in most other organs innervated by adrenergic neurons. The reasons for the regional differences are not known and further studies of the rate of catecholamine turn-over in the adrenergic neurons of fish are clearly indicated. 3. Adrenoceptors of both the α- and the β-type show great similarities with those of mammals. Some differences in the potencies of certain compounds (e.g., clonidine and methoxamine) exist and receptor binding studies should add valuable information about the adrenoceptors of teleosts. The existence of a subtype of β-adrenoceptor (if(β 2) has been proposed and further work is needed to confirm or deny the applicability of the β 1/ β 2 adrenoceptor terminology in fish. 4. There appears to be some differences in the mode of action of the so called “indirectly acting amines”, such as tyramine, between teleosts and mammals. While the uptake of tyramine into the nerve terminals in mammals appears to take place via the cocaine-sensitive neuronal uptake system which is also responsible for catecholamine uptake (uptake 1), tyramine uptake in cod neurons appears to be via a separate pathway. 5. Presynaptic supersensitivity of the type seen in mammals has also been demonstrated in teleost adrenergic neurons. Both denervation (chemical or surgical) and blockade of the neuronal uptake mechanism by cocaine or desipramine produce this type of supersensitivty, while post-synaptic supersensitivity has so far not been described in teleosts. The effects of removal of the uptake system shows that the uptake process may be as important in teleosts as in mammals in the removal of adrenergic transmitter from the synaptic cleft. 6. In the total picture of adrenergic functions in fish, the circulating catecholamines take a special role. Although the quantitative importance of control by circulating catecholamines compared to control by adrenergic neurons is not known in detail for any organ system, it seems likely that circulating catecholamines can provide a substantial adrenergic “tonus” which reinforces the adrenergic neurons in elasmobranch and teleost fish. 7. An interesting aspect of the autonomic nerve function in teleost fish is the possibility of neurons with more than one transmitter substance. So far, the evidence in favour of this hypothesis rests mainly on the assumed selectivity of 6-OH-DA and the histochemical picture of the sympathetic chain ganglia of the cod. Further work is obviously needed to establish the validity of this hypothesis.